World Health
Organization
Regional Committee
Fifty-fifth Session
11-13 September 2002 |
Regional Office For South-East Asia
Provisional Agenda item 10.1SEA/RC55/12
16 July 2002 |
Regional Mechanism for Bulk Purchase
Of Selected Generic Essential Drugs |

|
CONTENTS
- Introduction
- Issues in Developing the Bulk Purchase Schemes
2.1 Experiences from other Bulk Purchase Schemes
2.2 What are the drugs?
2.3 Principle of Pre-qualification of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers
2.4 Evaluation of Manufacturers
2.5 Criteria for Pre-Qualification
- Activities so Far
3.1 Health Secretaries Meeting
3.2 Potential Suppliers India
3.3 Potential Suppliers
Indonesia
3.4 Drug Regulators in SEAR
3.5 Other Potential Benefits
- SEAROs Potential Role in Implementing the
Potential BPS
- Conclusion
- Points for Consideration
6.1 Different Countries and
Different Interests
6.2 Sub-Regional Coordination in the BPS
6.3 Local Partners in the BPS
Annex Selected Essential Drugs for Bulk
Purchase Scheme
|
Introduction
At their meeting in August 2001, Health Ministers from
countries of the South-East Asia Region expressed concern about the quality of essential
drugs and requested WHO to assess whether a Bulk Purchasing Scheme (BPS) for generic
Essential Drugs of assured quality would be practical. The focus was on quality first and
then on bulk purchase, to decrease health care costs. The Ministers requested the Regional
Office to formulate a proposal and present it to the Regional Committee in September 2002.
The Health Ministers recommended that "WHO should offer technical
support and facilitate activities such as Bulk Purchase Schemes (BPS) for Essential Drugs
by generic name, and drug quality control systems, especially for the smaller countries in
the Region."
The proposed BPS has been developed after consultation with various sectors in
pharmaceuticals. It is meant to complement existing purchasing systems where appropriate,
and is clearly not meant to replace existing systems in a country. It is essentially a
technical proposal that requires discussion and decisions by the countries to define the
scope and future direction of the initiative.
Issues in
Developing the Bulk Purchase Schemes
2.1 Experiences from other Bulk
Purchase Schemes
Experiences from Bulk Purchase Schemes in other regions
have shown that each scheme needed some impetus generated from the Region itself,
expertise from within the region and decisions at a high political level. In the Fijian
BPS, pooled purchase was a part of the existing procedures. Small Island States such as
Tuvalu, Nauru, Guam, Tokelau, and Marshall Islands sold their produce as a group and also
bought as a group to increase their buying and selling power. Thus, a framework and
infrastructure of group activities did exist. Fiji, the biggest country in the group with
a population of approximately 850 000 served as the focal point. However, in contrast
to SEAR, it must be noted that the total population involved was about a million and there
were no local manufacturers or well developed Drug Regulatory Authorities (DRAs).
In the Caribbean, bulk purchasing was established in the
1980s and now has very strict rules, payment procedures making the scheme self-sufficient
and viable. Again, the population involved was small and the scheme was developed over
time. In Africa, the Bulk Purchase Scheme was mooted by the countries and WHO AFRO
provided technical support but the stewardship was by the countries. The Member Countries
have agreed on specifications of about five products and, therefore, to purchase these
drugs but the scheme is yet to be implemented widely.
A single successful model for bulk purchase does not
appear to exist but the modality seems particularly suited to smaller countries. Schemes
have to be developed using the strengths in the region and with necessary political
decisions. The clear strength in SEAR is the surfeit of manufacturers; careful
pre-qualification must be done to ensure quality in this situation of plenty.
2.2 What are the drugs?
It would not be possible to develop a scheme based on the 300+drugs in the WHO
Model Essential Drug List with many formulations, in the short first phase of an year.
Therefore, a list of commonly used essential drugs (oral formulations only) was identified
and the first phase of the scheme would be based on this list (see Annex).
2.3 Principle of Pre-qualification of
Pharmaceutical Manufacturers
EDM/HQ had recently developed a scheme for the UN system in which manufacturers with
acceptable quality of drugs for HIV/AIDS and its complications were identified, and listed
publicly. This exercise of pre-qualifying manufacturers rather than including all
registered manufacturers as suppliers is increasingly being used to assure quality. It has
been used with great success in vaccines for childhood immunization and also in supplies
such as condoms. The World Bank has recently accepted pre-qualification and does not, as
previously, insist on the lowest bid in an open tender being accepted.
Pre-qualification ensures quality. Thus, the lowest offer from
manufacturers who have pre-qualified ensures a quality product in a competitive
environment. The SEARO Bulk Purchase Scheme for Selected Quality Essential Drugs (BPS
SQED) has pre-qualification as the centrepiece for ensuring quality. However, ensuring
quality could have an impact on the cost of the product. Thus, countries need to consider
the scheme in the context of limited resources available for health.
2.4 Evaluation of Manufacturers
It would be ideal for SEARO to inspect the manufacturing facilities of companies
that would be potential suppliers to this scheme; however, it is impractical as there
would be hundreds of manufacturers. The WHO Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) Certificate
scheme provides a suitable entry point for pre-qualification. WHO, in its technical role
has provided the guidelines for the scheme to the countries, who, in turn, implement it
through inspections by their Drug Regulatory Authorities (DRAs). The GMP certificate
issued is therefore the responsibility of the DRA and not WHO and it is difficult at times
to ensure a consistent quality. Thus, WHOs GMP certificate would serve as the entry
point and further steps are needed for pre-qualification.
2.5 Criteria for Pre-Qualification
As the further steps in pre-qualification, inspection
and approval of a pharmaceutical manufacturing facility by an internationally recognized
DRA is proposed as the first criteria. These DRAs were listed as the US FDA, UK MCA,
Australian TGA and the South African Medicines Commission. There are manufacturers in SEAR
that have been inspected and approved.
This is a first list and other DRAs, both from within
and outside the Region, could be included as the scheme is developed. There are other
pharmaceutical companies pre-qualified to supply other UN agencies such as UNICEF.
Suppliers in these schemes too could be included.
The second criterion proposed is the ability of the
manufacturers to maintain the standard pharmacopeial specifications such as USP, BP and
Indian Pharmacopeia. The third is an export performance of at least 3 years.
These pre-qualification criteria could be modified
according to the needs of individual countries.
|
Activities
so Far
Countries have been contacted to enquire about the
quantities of the selected Essential Drugs that have been purchased by them in the past.
This information is vital for the pharmaceutical companies but has been difficult to
obtain. However, the quantities are likely to be substantial.
3.1 Health Secretaries Meeting
The scheme has been presented at the Health Secretaries Meeting in New Delhi in April
2002 and specific issues that may arise (registration of products in BPS, national
financial regulations on pre-qualification, regulations on foreign suppliers) were raised.
There was a query as to whether it was appropriate for WHO to be involved in purchasing
through selection of suppliers; however, if the involvement is transparent, scientifically
acceptable and done in a verifiable manner, there would be no repercussions on WHO. The
pre-qualification scheme for the UN system for HIV/AIDS drugs has shown that such
involvement is possible.
3.2 Potential Suppliers India
The scheme was presented to selected Indian Pharmaceutical companies (who are the
major suppliers in the Region) at a meeting of the Federation of Indian Chamber of
Commerce and Industry. There was interest as well as discussion of possible bottlenecks; a
strong request for the scheme to be implemented using the certification scheme in India
was made but there were far too many unresolved questions for this to be implemented.
3.3 Potential Suppliers Indonesia
The scheme has also been discussed with Indonesian manufacturers who were
interested if the selected essential drugs were routinely manufactured by them but they
would not manufacture specially for the scheme. It is hoped to discuss the scheme with
Thai Pharmaceutical Manufacturers too.
The other countries in the Region do not have manufacturers that
have been inspected and approved by the international DRAs that have been specified and
therefore do not qualify to be suppliers on the proposed criteria. However if these
manufacturers were to included with modified pre-qualification criteria, they too would be
invited to participate in the scheme.
3.4 Drug Regulators in SEAR
The scheme was finally discussed at a meeting of Drug Regulators in SEAR in late June.
Here the regulators described what steps had been taken in their countries to improve the
quality of essential drugs; some countries were able to manufacture most of their
requirements of essential drugs and the BPS had the potential of setting back these
manufacturers as they were not included in the suppliers. They emphasized that a fine
balance needs to be struck between the level of quality and encouraging local manufacture
in the Region.
There were also some apprehensions about the effect this scheme
would have on the local DRAs as well as regulatory capacity.
3.5 Other Potential Benefits
A list of pre-qualified manufacturers from SEAR would be useful to
other international agencies too and for SEARO procurement itself. Presently, SEARO itself
does not implement prequalification when purchasing pharmaceuticals. Multilateral
initiatives such as the Global Fund for AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria would prefer that
drugs be bought by the countries from a pre-qualified list of suppliers.
|
- SEAROs Potential
Role in Implementing the Potential BPS
The Regional Office would, as mentioned previously, be an information
provider in this scheme and its role would be to bring pre-qualified suppliers and
countries together to negotiate the quantities and the prices of the essential drugs. The
Regional Office would act as an "honest broker" in bringing the two parties
together and assist in technical matters. In implementation terms this could be seen as a
"No-hands On" model.
A more advanced model is possible but requires more
resources and therefore has to be considered within that context; this model maybe more
appropriate for the smaller countries. If a country specifies its requirements to WHO, the
latter would then get the best prices from the list of pre-qualified manufacturers for the
country. Additionally if countries could agree on common specifications for purchasing
essential drugs, the Regional Office could facilitate the joint purchase by the countries.
The economies of scale this would produce mean a further decrease in prices.
Conclusion
The WHO Medicines Strategy has four components: Policy, Access, Quality
and Safety and Rational Use. The object is to help save lives and improve health by
closing the huge gap between the potential that essential drugs have to offer and the
reality that for millions of people, particularly the poor and disadvantaged, medicines
are unavailable, unaffordable, unsafe or improperly used.
The Health Ministers meeting in August 2001 expressed concern and
requested SEARO to concentrate on mechanisms for procuring Quality Essential Drugs, the
very same area the World Health Assembly focused on in May 2002. Thus, the concerns of the
Region have been reflected subsequently in the Global Agenda and these concerns address
the constituency that needs it most quality essential drugs for the poor, the
marginalised and the disadvantaged.
The proposed BPS now requires discussion, evaluation and future
direction from the Member Countries. The current proposal is analogous to a limited buffet
meal with few items of good quality made by a few chefs, that is, a small number of
commonly-used essential drugs made by an even smaller number of pre-qualified
manufacturers from one or two countries. Would the countries like to sample this
"meal" now, or would they want to enlarge the meal further?
Keeping pre-qualification as the centrepiece, would countries
individually or as small groups like to modify/refine or further develop the criteria for
pre-qualification? This could allow manufacturers from more countries in the Region to
participate as suppliers and increase the options for the buyers too. It will also allow
DRAs in the Region to provide input to the scheme and also greater involvement of the
Ministries of Health.
The Bulk Purchase Scheme for Selected Quality Essential Drugs has been
developed to a technical level but there is a necessity now for discussion and decisions
to be made by the countries on its future direction.
|
Points for Consideration
It is unlikely that all countries in SEAR would be
equally interested in this BPS due to the very different pharmaceutical situation in the
individual countries.
6.1 Different Countries and Different
Interests
Some countries may see this scheme as being useful for purchasing
whereas other countries may want their manufactures to be the suppliers. Other countries
may see this scheme (or the process of pre-qualification) as useful for particular drugs.
Some countries may wish to buy a few drugs through this scheme to compare it with existing
systems and products.
6.2 Sub-Regional Coordination in the BPS
Due to the heterogeneity of the Region, similar countries may prefer to
develop their own standards in pre-qualification. Potential buyers may develop their own
pre-qualification criteria and potential suppliers could propose their pre-qualification
criteria too. The political and economic impetus for such work could be through
ministerial cooperation. SEARO could provide the technical and financial support needed
for the meetings and other activities that will develop these pre-qualification criteria.
Such activities would have the participation of the Drug Regulatory Authorities in those
countries as well as the supply divisions in the respective ministries of health
6.3 Local Partners in the BPS
Some countries may desire greater involvement of local partners as the
BPS could also be seen as an exercise in developing local capacity towards the final goal
of the country developing its self-sufficiency in essential drugs. A common problem in
this area is the maldistribution of pharmaceuticals which would negate what has been
achieved with the BPS. If a country has no suitable local manufacturer, then in the BPS, a
supplier from abroad would be inevitable. However the supplier could be required to link
with a local distributor as a part of the contract to deliver the drugs, then not only
quality drugs but expertise and systems to distribute pharmaceuticals will follow.
|
Annex
Selected Essential Drugs for Bulk Purchase Scheme
Drug |
Dosage Form |
Dose |
- Albendazole
|
Tablets |
400mg |
- Aluminium hydorxide
|
Tablets |
|
- Amoxicillin
|
Capsules |
250mg |
- Aspirin
|
Tablets |
300mg |
- Atenolol
|
Tablets |
50/100mg |
- Chloroquine
|
Tablets |
100mg |
- Chlorphenamine
|
Tablets |
4mg |
- Chlorpromazine
|
Tablets |
100mg |
- Cimetidine
|
Tablets |
200mg |
- Diazepam
|
Tablets |
5mg |
- Erythromycin
|
Caps/Tablets |
250mg |
- Ethambutol
|
Tablets |
100mg |
- Ferrous Salt
|
Tablets |
Equiv to 60mg |
- Furosemide
|
Tablets |
40mg |
- Glibenclamide
|
Tablets |
2.5/5mg |
- Hydrochlorothiazide
|
Tablets |
25/50mg |
- Ibuprofen
|
Tablets |
200/400 mg |
- Isoniazid
|
Tablets |
100mg |
- Mebendazole
|
Tablets |
100mg |
- Metoclopramide
|
Tablets |
10mg |
- Paracetamol
|
Tablets |
500mg |
- Phenoxymethilpenicillin
|
Tablets |
250mg |
- Phenytoin
|
Tablets/Capsules |
100mg |
- Prednisolone
|
Tablets |
5mg |
- Primaquine
|
Tablets |
7.5mg |
- Promethazine
|
Tablets |
25mg |
- Pyrazinamide
|
Tablets |
400mg |
- Rifampicin
|
Capsules |
150mg |
- Salbutamol
|
Tablets |
2/4mg |
- Sulfamethoxazole + trimethoprim
|
Tablets |
400+80mg |
|
|