Facts and Figures

Schizophrenia : Youth’s Greatest Disabler

Course and outcome of schizophrenia

The term ‘course’ refers to the pattern of progression of an illness over a period of time. The common types of courses are continuous illness, a relapsing course with increasing disability, and a single episode followed by complete improvement. Both short and long-term courses have been identified in relation to schizophrenia.

Violence

Studies indicate that people with schizophrenia are not excessively prone to violence, except patients with a past criminal record, history of associated substance abuse or alcohol dependence. More often, patients are withdrawn and prefer to be left alone. However, some patients, particularly during periods when they are hearing voices or imagining threatening gestures targeted towards them, may become violent. Friends and family are usually the target of this violence. Media often links mental illness and violence. However, it has been observed that many schizophrenics are not especially prone to violence. Media often uses terms such as ‘mentally ill’, ‘psychotic’, ‘lunatic’, ‘pagal’, ‘psychopathic’, while sensationalizing crime. This has resulted in the broad myth and perception that all persons with schizophrenia are dangerous.

Outcome of cases of schizophrenia

*      About 45 per cent recover after one or more episodes.

*      About 20 per cent show constant symptoms and increasing disability.

*      About 35 per cent display a mixed pattern, with varying degrees of improvement or deterioration. 

Outcome

The outcome is the status of the individual at a point in time or at the end point. Depending on the length of time for which the patient is followed up, the outcome can vary from one point in time to another. For chronic illnesses such as schizophrenia, it is more relevant to study the outcome at the end of five or ten years.

In the earlier half of the twentieth century, it was believed that schizophrenia is a prolonged illness with poor long-term prognosis. However, with the introduction of modern medicines, better community care and increasing awareness about the illness, the outcome of schizophrenia has, indeed, changed for the better. This has been adequately borne out by several multicentric studies.

Schizophrenia: patients falling into selected categories of course and outcome variables

Course and outcome category

Developing countries (%)

Developedcountries (%)

Remitting course with full remission

62.8

36.8

Continuous or episodic psychotic illness, without full remission

35.7

18.7

In psychotic episodes 25% of follow-up period

18.4

18.7

In psychotic episodes 76-100% of follow-up period

15.1

20.2

In complete remission 0% of follow-up period

24.1

57.2

In complete remission 76-100% of follow-up period

38.3

22.3

No antipsychotic medication throughout follow-up period

5.9

2.5

On antipsychotic medication 76-100% of follow-up period

15.9

60.8

Never hospitalized

55.5

8.1

Impaired social functioning throughout follow-up period

15.7

41.6

Unimpaired social functioning for 76-100% of follow-up period

42.9

31.6

Source: Jablensky A., Satorius N, Emberg G, Anker M, Korten A, Cooper JE, Day R, Bertelsen A. Schizophrenia: manifestations, incidence and course in different cultures. A World Health Organization ten-country study. Psychological Medicine. Monograph Supplement 1992;20:1-97. (Reproduced with permission from CambridgeUniversity Press)

Components of outcome

The outcome itself is usually not a unitary one, but has different dimensions. These are as follows.

 

*     Clinical outcome - improvement/persistence/deterioration of symptoms and signs of the disorder, number of relapses, intellectual performance;

*     Social functioning of the patient;

*     Work performance - this includes work in paid jobs outside the home, housework, studying (if a student), and work in a sheltered environment;

*     Quality of life - this is increasingly being recognized as an outcome dimension. 

In one individual, there could be much heterogeneity and only a weak relationship between these outcome dimensions. Though patients may be clinically asymptomatic, their social functioning could be poor and they may be unable to hold a job. It is equally likely that persons suffering from hallucinations or delusions may still be able to keep their job. Hence, for the purpose of psychosocial intervention, it is essential to assess each of these dimensions and plan programmes accordingly.

Family attitudes, emotions, their expression, and the nature and style of communication, have all been associated with an increased rate of relapse in schizophrenia.

Although schizophrenic symptoms are exacerbated following childbirth, the exact relationship is uncertain.

A consistent and repeated finding of research studies is that patients with schizophrenia in developing countries have a better outcome than in developed countries

Differences in outcome in developed and developing countries

A remarkable and consistent finding has been that in developing countries, schizophrenics have a better outcome. This was based on the fact that more patients in the developing world remained symptom-free for longer periods after the initial episode. This length of remission (symptom-free period) was unrelated to drug treatment since many in the developing world did not receive continuous treatment. Psychosocial factors, such as better family support, community tolerance, extended networks and more favourable job opportunities, have been postulated as the reasons for this observation. From several studies, it is known that short duration of initial episode, few episodes in the past, good adjustment patterns, being married, early diagnosis and initiation of treatment, acute onset, good social support networks and total compliance to medication are some factors favouring good prognosis in schizophrenia.

Prognostic factors

Of all the prognostic factors outlined above, one single factor amenable to correction and/or modification is proper treatment consisting of early identification, treatment with medicines, family education and psychosocial rehabilitation. Unfortunately, however, health care facilities for such treatment are woefully inadequate in developing countries.

Factors indicating a better outcome in patients:

*     Female gender

*     Married status

*     Early treatment

*     Acute onset of illness

*     Rural background and cohesive family

*     Absence of negative symptoms

*     Predominance of florid positive symptoms

*     Short duration of first episode

*     Few episodes of similar illness in the past

*     Good premorbid personality and adjustment

Factors indicating a poor outcome in patients:

*     Male gender

*     Unmarried status

*     Earlier age of onset of illness

*     Delayed treatment

*     Irregular treatment

*     Gradual (insidious) onset of illness

*     Lack of social support

*     More negative symptoms

*     Positive family history of schizophrenia or major psychoses

*     Poor social and occupational functioning before the onset of the illness

*     Large size of ventricles of the brain, presence of subtle neurological signs

*     History of substance abuse or alcohol dependence

*     Excessive criticism, hostility or over-involvement in the home and family atmosphere

 

A true story

Gajraj is a young man of 25 living in Chansa, a village 50 km from New Delhi, India. Some months ago, he started hearing ‘voices’ which began to control his behaviour. His family members and neighbours thought he had "gone mad". They took him to a faith healer who gave him large doses of laxatives to purge out evil spirits from his body. Gajraj was almost on his death bed. Somehow, Gajraj’s father felt something was not right and took him to the community health centre 15 km away. The doctor at the health centre first gave Gajraj intravenous fluids to replace what had been lost due to laxatives. After taking a history, the doctor diagnosed Gajraj’s condition as schizophrenia. He spent almost one hour explaining to the family about the disease, about the need for medication and that Gajraj could benefit from treatment. He also advised that Gajraj should continue to perform routine agricultural work under supervision. He even offered to send his field health worker for periodic follow-up. Gajraj is now well adjusted, lives happily with his family and works in the field. He takes his medications daily.

- As reported by Gajraj’s father

 

 

| | | | | |