|
The term ‘course’ refers to the pattern of progression
of an illness over a period of time. The common types of courses are
continuous illness, a relapsing course with increasing disability, and a
single episode followed by complete improvement. Both short and long-term
courses have been identified in relation to schizophrenia.
Violence
Studies indicate that people with schizophrenia are not
excessively prone to violence, except patients with a past criminal record,
history of associated substance abuse or alcohol dependence. More often,
patients are withdrawn and prefer to be left alone. However, some patients,
particularly during periods when they are hearing voices or imagining
threatening gestures targeted towards them, may become violent. Friends and
family are usually the target of this violence.
Media often links mental illness and violence. However, it has been observed
that many schizophrenics are not especially prone to violence. Media often
uses terms such as ‘mentally ill’, ‘psychotic’, ‘lunatic’, ‘pagal’, ‘psychopathic’, while sensationalizing
crime. This has resulted in the broad myth and perception that all persons
with schizophrenia are dangerous.
|
Outcome of cases of schizophrenia
About 45 per cent recover after one or more
episodes.
About 20 per cent show constant symptoms and
increasing disability.
About 35 per cent display a mixed pattern,
with varying degrees of improvement or deterioration.
|
Outcome
The
outcome is the status of the individual at a point in time or at the end
point. Depending on the length of time for which the patient is followed up,
the outcome can vary from one point in time to another. For chronic illnesses
such as schizophrenia, it is more relevant to study the outcome at the end of
five or ten years.
In
the earlier half of the twentieth century, it was believed that schizophrenia
is a prolonged illness with poor long-term prognosis. However, with the
introduction of modern medicines, better community care and increasing
awareness about the illness, the outcome of schizophrenia has, indeed,
changed for the better. This has been adequately borne out by several multicentric studies.
Schizophrenia:
patients falling into selected categories of course and outcome variables
|
Course
and outcome category
|
Developing
countries (%)
|
Developedcountries (%)
|
|
Remitting
course with full remission
|
62.8
|
36.8
|
|
Continuous
or episodic psychotic illness, without full remission
|
35.7
|
18.7
|
|
In
psychotic episodes 25% of follow-up period
|
18.4
|
18.7
|
|
In
psychotic episodes 76-100% of follow-up period
|
15.1
|
20.2
|
|
In
complete remission 0% of follow-up period
|
24.1
|
57.2
|
|
In
complete remission 76-100% of follow-up period
|
38.3
|
22.3
|
|
No antipsychotic medication throughout follow-up period
|
5.9
|
2.5
|
|
On antipsychotic medication 76-100% of follow-up period
|
15.9
|
60.8
|
|
Never
hospitalized
|
55.5
|
8.1
|
|
Impaired
social functioning throughout follow-up period
|
15.7
|
41.6
|
|
Unimpaired
social functioning for 76-100% of follow-up period
|
42.9
|
31.6
|
Source: Jablensky A., Satorius
N, Emberg G, Anker M, Korten A, Cooper JE, Day R, Bertelsen
A. Schizophrenia: manifestations, incidence and course in different cultures.
A World Health Organization ten-country study. Psychological Medicine.
Monograph Supplement 1992;20:1-97. (Reproduced with
permission from CambridgeUniversity Press)

Components of outcome
The
outcome itself is usually not a unitary one, but has different dimensions.
These are as follows.
Clinical outcome -
improvement/persistence/deterioration of symptoms and signs of the disorder,
number of relapses, intellectual performance;
Social functioning of the patient;
Work performance - this includes work in paid
jobs outside the home, housework, studying (if a student), and work in a
sheltered environment;
Quality of life - this is increasingly being
recognized as an outcome dimension.
In
one individual, there could be much heterogeneity and only a weak
relationship between these outcome dimensions. Though patients may be
clinically asymptomatic, their social functioning could be poor and they may
be unable to hold a job. It is equally likely that persons suffering from hallucinations
or delusions may still be able to keep their job. Hence, for the purpose of
psychosocial intervention, it is essential to assess each of these dimensions
and plan programmes accordingly.
Family
attitudes, emotions, their expression, and the nature and style of
communication, have all been associated with an increased rate of relapse in
schizophrenia.
Although
schizophrenic symptoms are exacerbated following childbirth, the exact
relationship is uncertain.
|
A consistent and repeated finding of research studies
is that patients with schizophrenia in developing countries have a better
outcome than in developed countries
|
Differences in outcome in developed and developing countries
A
remarkable and consistent finding has been that in developing countries,
schizophrenics have a better outcome. This was based on the fact that more
patients in the developing world remained symptom-free for longer periods
after the initial episode. This length of remission (symptom-free period) was
unrelated to drug treatment since many in the developing world did not
receive continuous treatment. Psychosocial factors, such as better family
support, community tolerance, extended networks and more favourable
job opportunities, have been postulated as the reasons for this observation.
From several studies, it is known that short duration of initial episode, few
episodes in the past, good adjustment patterns, being married, early
diagnosis and initiation of treatment, acute onset, good social support
networks and total compliance to medication are some factors favouring good prognosis in schizophrenia.
Prognostic factors
Of
all the prognostic factors outlined above, one single factor amenable to
correction and/or modification is proper treatment consisting of early
identification, treatment with medicines, family education and psychosocial
rehabilitation. Unfortunately, however, health care facilities for such
treatment are woefully inadequate in developing countries.
Factors indicating a better outcome in patients:
Female gender
Married status
Early treatment
Acute onset of illness
Rural background and cohesive family
Absence of negative symptoms
Predominance of florid positive symptoms
Short duration of first episode
Few episodes of similar illness in the past
Good premorbid personality
and adjustment
Factors indicating a
poor outcome in patients:
Male gender
Unmarried status
Earlier age of onset of illness
Delayed treatment
Irregular treatment
Gradual (insidious) onset of illness
Lack of social support
More negative symptoms
Positive family history of schizophrenia or
major psychoses
Poor social and occupational functioning
before the onset of the illness
Large size of ventricles of the brain,
presence of subtle neurological signs
History of substance abuse or alcohol
dependence
Excessive criticism, hostility or
over-involvement in the home and family atmosphere
|
A true story
Gajraj is a young man of 25 living in Chansa,
a village 50 km from New Delhi, India. Some months ago, he started
hearing ‘voices’ which began to control his behaviour.
His family members and neighbours thought he had
"gone mad". They took him to a faith healer who gave him large
doses of laxatives to purge out evil spirits from his body. Gajraj was almost on his death bed. Somehow, Gajraj’s father felt something was not right and took
him to the community health centre 15 km away.
The doctor at the health centre first gave Gajraj intravenous fluids to replace what had been lost
due to laxatives. After taking a history, the doctor diagnosed Gajraj’s condition as schizophrenia. He spent almost
one hour explaining to the family about the disease, about the need for
medication and that Gajraj could benefit from
treatment. He also advised that Gajraj should
continue to perform routine agricultural work under supervision. He even
offered to send his field health worker for periodic follow-up. Gajraj is now well adjusted, lives happily with his
family and works in the field. He takes his medications daily.
- As reported by Gajraj’s father
|
|