|

As
compared to 2000, in 5 countries of the Region namely Bhutan, DPRK, Sri
Lanka, Nepal
and Thailand, malaria
incidence (of confirmed cases) has reduced more than 50% where as in India
the reduction is more than 25%.
The
reported Malaria Mortality in the SEA Region has reduced by 58% as compared to 2000. Bangladesh,
Bhutan, Myanmar, Sri
Lanka and Thailand shown more than 65%
reduction in malaria mortality.
The
overall cumulative availability of effective bednets (LLINs/ ITNs amongst
population at risk (API>1) has increased from 4.3 millions in 2005 to 17.1
millions in 2010 showing an increase of 298% (Fig 1). Apart from Sri
Lanka where population at high risk(API> 1) is nil
and Nepal where the
said population is very low, the
coverage of LLIN / ITN amongst eligible population (API> 1) is highest in Bhutan followed by Bangladesh. In Nepal, the
entire eligible population covered under LLINs besides many people in low
risk of malaria (API<1) are covered under LLINs. In Sri Lanka, as the entire
population is at low risk only, therefore, LLIN /ITN coverage is shown accordingly (Fig. 2 ).
The coverage under IRS for eligible population (at high risk of malaria) has reached 56.6 million (Fig.
3).
The
availability of RDT has increased from 1.2 million in 2005 to 10.1 million
(relates to 2008; figures for 2009 & 2010 are not available) showing an
increase of 841% .
The
availability of ACT has increased from 78900 in 2005 to 3913913 in 2010
showing an increase of around 49 times.
Policy
All countries in the region are implementing the 2 main
vector control measures (LLINs and IRS) depending on the epidemiological
setting. Since the adhesion to countries in SEA to the WHO Global Malaria
Control Strategy in 1992, IRS has been the main tool used for vector control,
especially in high-transmission settings and for the control of epidemics.
However in the past years tremendous efforts have been made to scale-up the
use of insecticide-treated nets one of the priorities of the Revised Malaria
Control Strategy 2006-2010 of the region.
Drug policy changed in the countries and ACT has been
introduced in all the countries. P.
vivax cases are treated with CQ and PQ in all places where resistance is not
developed yet.. Since the burden on pregnant women in the region is
relatively low, countries in the region are not using IPTp (although
recommending the use of personal protection with LLINs for pregnant women).
Interventions
coverage
Over the past years, significant progress has been
witnessed among countries in the Region in increasing access levels to key
malaria control interventions: in particular, Bangladesh and Bhutan have
shown strong capabilities to increase access to LLINs and India, Sri Lanka
and Thailand have conducted successful large scale IRS programs. The summary of malaria prevention status in the SEA Region has been placed under Tab. 1.
Access to LLINs has been very low until recently. The
overall bednet coverage (LLINs / ITNs) in the Region has increased slowly but
steadily from 1.3% in 2005 to 9.0% in 2010 (Fig. 1 ) among the population at
high and moderate risk (API> 1) of
malaria in the Region. Bhutan, Bangladesh,
and Thailand
and Timor-Leste have made a significant contribution in this regard. The
access to ITNs/LLINs varies wildly across countries, from a 76% in Indonesia ( in some project areas) to over 95% in Bhutan. In Bangladesh, in 13 high endemic districts, the
bednet coverage amongst the HHs ranges from 40%-55% where as
in Indonesia,
in the seven highest malaria burden provinces, 92%-99% of households were covered
under LLINs with support from the Global Fund.
IRS is used in high transmission settings and in case of
major outbreaks. India, Nepal,
Sri Lanka and Thailand
are using IRS as a primary vector control measure. In other countries, the
same is applied mostly to control epidemics.
In Bangladesh,
although there is a policy to apply IRS but they have stopped using it since
1991 where as DPRK has started using the same since 2008. In 2010, Timor Leste used IRS first time
for malaria control programme. The criteria for applying IRS differ from
country to country. In a big country
like India IRS is practiced in areas with API>2. Sri Lanka, Thailand
and Nepal
are applying IRS to the areas with API< 1 as per their intervention
policy. During 2000 -2010, the population covered under IRS were between
41–81 million where as total population at risk with API> 10 were around
106-203 million covering 22.8% - 64.3% of the population at high risk
(API>10) under IRS. In 2010, 57.9 million population was covered under
IRS in the Region. India alone
sprayed 53.4 million population followed by DPRK (2.0 million),
Significant progress has been made recently because of
availability of resources through donors specially Global Funds in this
direction. Around 101.1 million blood
examination (ABER = 8.3%) were performed during 2009 in the public sector in
the Region. In Bangladesh and Myanmar intensive case finding
was reported and hard to reach population were also covered through RDTs
during 2008. The usage of RDT’s grown
from 1.2 million in 2005 to 10.1 million in 2008 (around ten fold) where as
the number of ACT treatment doses have been increased from 78,900 to 1,726,158 showing approximate 21 fold increase over the same period (Tab. 2). Tab. 2
: Intervention Coverage in
SEA Region 2005-2010
|
Year
|
ITNs + LLINs*
|
ACT
|
RDT
|
|
2005
|
4,219,906
|
78,900
|
1,200,000
|
|
2006
|
5,305,344
|
604,241
|
2,862,000
|
|
2007
|
11,139,329
|
959,118
|
9,452,500
|
|
2008
|
14,258,418
|
1,308,199
|
10,068,000
|
|
2009
|
17,282,848
|
1,726,158
|
11,057,141
|
|
2010
|
17,050,567
|
3,913,913
|
15,164,372
|
Source: Country Report, 2010; * Cumulative effective
ITNs/LLINs
During 2001-2010, the overall malaria incidence in the SEA
Region has not declined much. This was
mainly due to intensive case finding with increased funding using RDT at
community level as well as in hard to reach areas. On the other hand, due to usage of ACTs by
malaria programmes in the Region, the malaria mortality has significantly
declined in the Region as a whole. The confirmed malaria cases and deaths declined
by 5.4% and 51.4% respectively during the above mentioned period. Bhutan,
DPR Korea, India, Sri Lanka and Thailand were the key achievers in this regard (Fig. 4).
Of the 10 malaria-endemic countries in the Region, Sri Lanka and DPR Korea have reached at the
malaria pre-elimination stage whereas two other countries, Bhutan,
Nepal and Thailand,
have made good progress in this direction.
Other Related
Information
Figures
Fig1- Cumulative Availability of Effective
Long Lasting Inscticide Treated Nets (LLINs) / Insecticide Treated Nets (ITNS) & Population at Risk (API >1) Covered in SEA Region, 2005-2010 [PDF 25 KB]
Fig2- Percentage Population at Risk (API>1) Covered under LLINs/ ITNs in SEA Region, 2010 [PDF 31 KB]
Fig3- Population at High Risk of Malaria Covered under IRS in SEA Region, 1996-2010 [PDF 79 KB]
Fig4- Malaria incidence (confirmed cases)
per 1000 population at risk of malaria in selected countries of the SEA Region) 2001-2010 [PDF 16 KB]
Tables
Tab1- Population Covered under Bednets & IRS in SEA Region, 2010
[PDF 16 KB]
|